🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.